Matteo Gigante vs Rohan Murali Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Feb at 09:36 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Gigante vs R. Murali

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gigante 1 - 0 Murali
They have played 2 sets in total, with Matteo Gigante winning 2 and Rohan Murali winning 0. The last match between Matteo Gigante and Rohan Murali was at the San Diego Challenger, 25-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Matteo Gigante getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gigante | 1 |
| Murali | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) San Diego Challenger(02-25-25)
M. Gigante vs R. Murali H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $571,445 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.68% (169-124) | Career Total W/L | 46.43% (13-15) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 50.00% (5-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Gigante vs R. Murali Match Preview:
Analyzing the recent performances on second serve, Gigante has secured 47.93% of points in the last six months. In contrast, Murali has performed slightly better, winning 51.85% of second serve points. This difference can significantly influence match predictions, as it has a high correlation with predicting outcomes.
The return game analysis, focusing on recent form, highlights that Gigante has claimed 54.38% of points on their opponent’s second serve. Murali surpasses this, with a success rate of 56.92%. When it comes to the first serve return, Gigante has a capture rate of 28.84%, overshadowed by Murali’s superior 42.45%. These statistics heavily influence predictions on who is favored in their head-to-head confrontation.
Looking at under pressure performance, Gigante has shown resilience by saving 54.11% of breakpoints recently, compared to Murali's 45.45%. This metric proves invaluable for making in-game betting predictions. Examining overall performance in the past year, Gigante boasts a winning record of 54.55% (W/L 30/25), while Murali holds a 50% win rate (W/L 3/3), offering an overarching view of head-to-head competition.
Surface preference also plays a role. Gigante is particularly successful on hard courts, with a career win percentage of 72% (W/L 52/20). Their least favorable surface is indoor hard, with a 26% win rate (W/L 9/25). Murali's best surface statistically is also hard, showing a win percentage of 44% (W/L 8/10), identical to their least effective surface.
Considering the player level, Gigante has predominantly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K over the past year, achieving a win rate of 58.33% (W/L 21/15). On the other hand, Murali’s match experience mostly falls within Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments valuing at $10K, with a 25% win record (W/L 1/3). Therefore, it's essential to weigh these numbers based on the competition level each has faced.
Delving into opponent quality, Gigante has battled opponents with an average rank of 183.69 in the last 12 months, whereas Murali faced players averaging 342.17. In deciding set performances, Gigante has manifested robustness by winning 71% of such sets in the past year, while Murali has managed a mere 33%. This data becomes particularly useful for live predictions and betting strategies if the match extends to a deciding set.
During a current event, past player performance is crucial, but assessing ongoing player form can reveal potential favorites, especially as certain players thrive in specific tournaments. An examination of their breakpoint conversion showcases that Gigante converts 39.63% of opportunities, whereas Murali achieves 41.67%. This is a vital statistic for live betting predictions during a match when either player faces a breakpoint.
Analyzing these metrics collectively, Gigante appears to have an edge with higher resilience in deciding sets, superior historical performance, and a preference for hard court surfaces. These insights suggest that Gigante might be poised to clinch victory in their upcoming match against Murali.
Matteo Gigante vs Rohan Murali Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Gigante vs R. Murali H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:24:26 | Average Match Time | 1:24:26 |
| 60% (34/57) | 1st Serve % | 51% (30/59) |
| 79% (27/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (17/30) |
| 30% (7/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (13/29) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 49% (29/59) | Return Points Win % | 40% (23/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Gigante Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 4-2 ret. | ||
R2 | L | w/o | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q2 | L | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
R. Murali Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 3-6 10-8 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||

M. Gigante vs R. Murali Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.68% (169/124) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.43% (13/15) |
| 55.33% (384/310) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.15% (30/35) |
| 51.96% (3409/3152) | Games Win/Loss | 49.51% (305/311) |
| 67.44% (58/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.43% (13/15) |
| 59.26% (96/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 27.78% (10/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.56% (5/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 934 | Aces Total | 23 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1012 | Total Double Faults | 78 |
| 1:35:50 | Average Match Time | 1:9:38 |
| 359.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 418.89 |
| 59% (11812/19965) | 1st Serve % | 55% (631/1154) |
| 68% (8068/11812) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (392/631) |
| 49% (4031/8153) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (247/523) |
| 43% (920/2128) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (64/146) |
| 41% (8280/20212) | Return Points Win % | 45% (520/1168) |
| 57.69% (15/11) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.07% (109/82) | Challenger W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 72.55% (37/14) | Futures W/L | 44.00% (11/14) |
| 58% (164/281) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (12/27) |
| 38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (51/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 57% (59/103) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 79% (173/137) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (11/9) |
| 20% (173/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (11/2) |
| 25% (120/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (17/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
